Akhilesh Yadav @ Akhilesh Prasad Yadav@Akhlesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8603 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-425 Year-2020 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

AKHILESH YADAV @ AKHILESH PRASAD YADAV@AKHLESH YADAV Son of Tulshi Yadav Resident of Village- Gopalpur (Dewaur), P.S.- Rajauli, District- Nawada.

2.

Vikash Kumar Son of Satyendra Yadav @ Satyendra Kumar Nirala Resident of Village- Gopalpur (Dewaur), P.S.- Rajauli, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhavesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 413, 414, 420, of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. He submits that no incriminating article has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8603 of 2021(2) dt.13-12-2021 2/2 recovered from the possession of the petitioners. He submits that petitioners bear no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioners.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 425 of 2020 pending before the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada. If the petitioners surrender before the learned court below and pray for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the learned court below on the same day without being prejudiced by this order.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T