Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63649/2018bail granted

Rudal Kumar @ Raju Kumar Paswan And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-29Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63649 of 2018 (2) dt.29-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.63649 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -184 Year- 2018 Thana -ITARHI District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. Rudal Kumar @ Raju Kumar Paswan Son of Chandrama Paswan

2. Mantu Ram @ Rakesh Kumar Ram Son of Brajesh Ram Both are Resdident of Village-Bhitihara Police Station Itarhi in the Distt. of Buxar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioners seek bail in Itarhi P.S. Case No. 184/2018 (P.O.C.S.O. Case No. 38/2018), registered for the offences punishable under Sections 354(d), 504, 509, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant alleged that while she was returning from the school, in the way the accused persons passed comment on her with obscene words. On protest, they started teasing her, anyhow the informant fled away from there.

It has been submitted that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case due to enmity. There is land dispute. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. They are in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63649 of 2018 (2) dt.29-10-2018 custody since 29.08.2018.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioners abovenamed, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District & Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge, P.O.C.S.O., Buxar in connection with Itarhi P.S. Case No. 184/2018 (P.O.C.S.O. Case No. 38/2018), subject to the conditions:

(1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3.) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T