← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8795/2021bail granted

Santosh Rai @ Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-04-06Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8795 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-408 Year-2020 Thana- SAHEBGANJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== SANTOSH RAI @ SANTOSH KUMAR Son of Rameshwar Ray Resident of Village - Mohabbatpur Chhapara, P.S. - Deoriya, District - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. N. Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-04-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 272, ,273, 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The prosecution case, in short, is that550.305 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of disclosure made by the co-accused. Except for this, there is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8795 of 2021(2) dt.06-04-2021 2/2 no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 550.305 liters wine is recovered from the pick up van. The pick up van in question does not belong to the petitioner. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 408 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.