Sheo Shankar Sah @ Kariya Sah @ Shankar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10649 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -257 Year- 2015 Thana -CHARPOKHARI District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Sheo Shankar Sah @ Kariya Sah @ Shankar Sah S/o Late Hirdya Narayan Sah @ Hirdaya Sah, R/o Vill.- Chandi (Harpur), P.S.- Charpokhari , Distt.- Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Ranjan Pd. Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail which was earlier rejected twice by orders dated 06.05.2016 and 19.04.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 12933 of 2016 and 5659 of 2017 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 15.01.2016, there is no direct circumstancial evidence against him, other co-accused except Deepak Paswan has already been allowed bail and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded though there was direction to conclude the trial within six months and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10649 of 2018 (4) dt.25-04-2018 2/2 The learned A.P.P. opposes prayer for bail of the petitioner by submitting that Kamta Mushar being an eye witness has stated the name of the petitioner also that he and others took away the deceased at the point of gun. .

In the facts and circumstances stated above, at present finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail, again prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 257 of 2015 pending in the court of C.J.M, Bhojpur at Ara. .

However, considering detention of the petitioner let the trial be expedited and concluded as early as possible preferably within four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T