Mantosh Manjhi @ Mantosh Kumar Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58737 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-338 Year-2018 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Mantosh Manjhi @ Mantosh Kumar Manjhi, Son of Late Jitendra Manjhi, Resident of Village- Fulbariya Hat Ward No.01, Police Station- Forbesganj, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Ashok Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 338 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering the nature of allegation against petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly the prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

However, after six months of custody the petitioner would be enlarge on bail by the court below itself on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58737 of 2018(2) dt.10-10-2018 2/2 Magistrate, Araria, in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 338 of 2018 subject to further conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T