Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55487/2016bail granted

Mamita @ Mamta Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2017-01-31Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55487 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -890 Year- 2016 Thana -SASARAM MUFFSIL District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Mamita @ Mamta Devi wife of Shyam Sunder Paswan @ Indu Paswan, resident of Village: Sri Khinda, Police Station: Nokha, District: Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hari Mohan Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-01-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 6.9.2016 in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No. 890 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 302, 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no eye witness of the occurrence and whatever allegation is leveled against the petitioner is that during course of investigation, she has been implicated merely on suspicion. The petitioner remained in custody for more than four months. It has further been submitted that co-accused having similar allegation has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr.Misc.No. 52786 of 2016 dated 17.1.2017.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55487 of 2016 (3) dt.31-01-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard the learned counsel for both side and considering the submissions, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S.Case No. 890 of 2016, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) A.I./- U