Seema Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12547 of 2023 ====================================================== Seema Kumari Wife of Kaushal Kishore Prasad, Resident of Village- Araria, P.S.- Kundwa Chainpur, District- East Champaran, Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.
The Director, I.C.D.S. (Social Welfare Department) Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, District- East Champaran, Motihari. 5.
The District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari. 6.
The District Programme Officer, ICDS, East Champaran, Motihari. 7.
The Child Development Project Officer, Ghorasahan, East Champaran, Motihari.
8.
Rani Kumari Wife of Rakesh Yadav, Resident of Village- Arariya, P.S.- Kundwa Chainpur, District- East Champaran, Motihari. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Sunil Kumar Mandal ( Sc 3 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 15-01-2024
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1(i) For issuance of writ nature of mandamus for direction to respondents for considering the application dated 11.09.2019 and 02.04.2023 filed before the Respondents by alleging that respondent No.8 got selection on the post of Anganwari Sevika at Anganwari Centre-No. 179 on the basis of the forged mark sheet.
(ii) Further issue direction to respondents for considering the case of the petitioner for selection on
Patna High Court CWJC No.12547 of 2023(2) dt.15-01-2024 2/2 the post sevika Sevika in the Anganwari Centre No. 179 on the ground she has better percentage marks to the Respondent No.8."
2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.
3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U