Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Kumar Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62988 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -381 Year- 2018 Thana -MOTIHARI TOWN DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Kumar Sahani, Son of Uma Shankar Sahani, Resident of Village- Madhuban Kanti, P.S. Minapur (Panapur O.P.), District-Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nachiketa Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 381/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 379, 414, 467, 468, 471, 413 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 43 and 66(C) of I.T. Act.

On suspicion, police apprehended two persons who disclosed their names as, Rahul and Aniket. On search, A.T.M. cards, documents and other articles were recovered from their possession.

It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. His name surfaced in this case on confession of co-accused. No incriminating material was found against him.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62988 of 2018 (2) dt.25-10-2018 2/2 Petitioner is in custody since 20.06.2018.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 381/2018, subject to the conditions: (1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bonds.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T