Dukum Kumar Yadav @ Hukum Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52767 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-347 Year-2022 Thana- BHAGWAN BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== Dukum Kumar Yadav @ Hukum Kumar Yadav Son of Lagandev Ray R/VJatua, P.S- Bhagwan Bazar Dist- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 15-10-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 347 of 2022 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 14.07.2022.

The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where, there was recovery of 400 litres of illicit IMFL/country made liquor. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner was the driver of alleged vehicle from where, recovery of illicit liquor was made, where nothing surfaced

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52767 of 2022(2) dt.15-10-2022 2/2 during the course of investigation that petitioner was under knowledge to have in possession of illicit liquor and as such it can be safely gathered that recovery of illicit liquor was not made from conscious physical possession of this petitioner. While concluding the argument, it has been submitted that investigation of this case has been completed, where charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. Learned APP, opposes the prayer of bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as recovery of illicit liquor not appears from conscious physical possession of this petitioner coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 347 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-IIcum- 1st Special Judge, Excise, Saran at Chapra/concerned Court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) Archana/- U T