Nitish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.62915 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -175 Year- 2018 Thana -ALAMGANJ District- PATNA ====================================================== Nitish Kumar Son of Raj Kumar Bind Resident -Bind Toli Satbigha Chandani Chowk P.S. and Distt.-Sheikhpura .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Anjani Pd. Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Pronati Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in Alamganj P.S. Case No. 175/2018, registered for the offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation is theft of motorcycle of informant. The vehicle was registered in the name of his brother. It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. His name has surfaced in this case on confession of co-accused. Save and except confession of coaccused no incriminating article has been found against him. Petitioner is in custody since 04.06.2018.
Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner above-
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62915 of 2018 (2) dt.12-10-2018 2/2 named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patnacity in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 175/2018, subject to the conditions:
(1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bonds.
(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T