Mantosh Ram @ Matosh Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9075 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-436 Year-2019 Thana- MINAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

MANTOSH RAM @ MATOSH KUMAR RAM Son of Horeel Ram Resident of Village- Puraina, P.S.- Minapur (Panapur O.P.), DistrictMuzaffarpur. 2.

Rajiv Kumar @ Rajiv Ram Son of Horeel Ram, Resident of VillagePuraina, P.S.- Minapur (Panapur O.P.), District- Muzaffarpur. 3.

Soni Devi Wife of Lalan Ram, Resident of Village- Puraina, P.S.- Minapur (Panapur O.P.), District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Neeraj Kumar Alias Sanidh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 436 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under sections 342, 338, 307, 325, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners no. 1 and 2 are step sons of deceased Shanti Devi and petitioner no. 3 is her step daughter-in-law. The allegation against them is of badly assaulting the deceased and her husband the informant, by lathi, danda etc. The impugned order shows that in paragraph nos. 7, 8,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9075 of 2021(2) dt.22-12-2021 2/2 19, 20, 21 and 22 of the case diary, the informant and witnesses have fully supported the occurrence and as per post mortem report, the injuries were found on the person of the deceased Shanti Devi.

In these circumstances, it is not a fit case for anticipatory bail and accordingly the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey , J) Mahesh/- U T