Amod Yadav @ Ranjit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52133 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2021 Thana- CHANDI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Amod Yadav @ Ranjit Kumar Son of Nand Kumar Yadav @ Nand Kumar Singh R/O Village- Ramdihal Tola, P.S.- Chandi, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 13-10-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 187 of 2021 registered for the offence under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 08.08.2022.
The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where, there was recovery of 50 litres of IMFL/country made liquor. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that recovery of alleged illicit liquor was made from on open field, which is generally called "Aahar", which is accessible by
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52133 of 2022(2) dt.13-10-2022 2/2 general public and as such it can be safely gathered that recovery of illicit liquor was not made from physical possession of this petitioner. It is further submitted that seizure list appears disputed as same is not supported by independent witnesses, rather by police personnels. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that investigation of this case is complete, where charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. Learned APP, opposes the prayer of bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as recovery of illicit liquor is from an open field, where seizure list appears disputed being not supported by independent witnesses coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 187 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.1st, Bhojpur, Ara/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) Archana/- U T