← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52301/2022bail granted

Binod Sahni @ Vinod Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-16Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52301 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2022 Thana- SAHARGHAT District- Madhubani ====================================================== BINOD SAHNI @ VINOD SAHNI Son of Sri Raghunath Sahni Resident of Village - Ashramghat Chowk, Balughat, Ward No. 15, P.S. Sadar (Town), District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Meena Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Prosecution allegation, in short, is that that the truck in question of the informant went missing from the parked place.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 27.07.2022. Chargesheet/prosecution report has been submitted in this case. There

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52301 of 2022(2) dt.16-12-2022 2/2 is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has transpired in course of investigation. It is alleged that the petitioner's son had purchased truck in question without knowing the fact that the truck in question is stolen property. Due to mistake of fact, the petitioner has been made accused in the present case.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-II Benipatti, Madhubani in connection with Saharghat P.S. Case No. 63 of 2022.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T