Navneet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53287 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-678 Year-2021 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Navneet Kumar Son Of Uday Kumar Mishra Resident Of Village And PostKamtaul, Ps- Kamtaul, Dist- Darbhanga At Present R/O Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Dakshin Raipur Branch, Ps- Dholahat South, 24 Parganas, West Bengal- 743349 ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Suprabha Kumari Daughter Of Sri Bharat Singh R/O Village And Po- Dulha, Ps- Bisfi, Dist- Madhubani, At Present R/O Poonam Sadan, Krishnapuri, Shekhpur, Ps- Ahiapur, Muzaffarpur, Bihar-842002 ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Praveen Kumar For the State :
Mr. Rana Randhir Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Pravesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 678 of 2021, for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 506, 406 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have tortured the complainant mentally and physically and ousted her from the matrimonial home due to non-fulfillment of demand of Rs. 4
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53287 of 2023(5) dt.06-03-2024 2/3 Lakhs and a four wheeler as dowry.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner is the husband of the complainant. The petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the complainant. The petitioner is ready to keep the complainant (O.P. No.2) with full dignity and honour. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of "Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182." Learned counsel has further relied on the judgments in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another (2022) 10 SCR 351 and Md. Asfak Alam Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr. Passed in Criminal Appeal No(s). 2207 of 2023, arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No. 3433 of 2023. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the allegation being general and omnibus
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53287 of 2023(5) dt.06-03-2024 3/3 against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, East, Muzaffarpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 678 of 2021, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with further conditions:- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.
7. If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.
8. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Ranjeet/- U T