← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62977/2024bail rejected

Bal Kumar Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-21Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62977 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2024 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Bal Kumar Sahni son of Late Duli Sahni Village- Loharganwa W.No-4, PsGarahiya OP Dist- East Champaran 2.

Phul Kumari Devi wife of Bal Kumar Sahni Village- Loharganwa W.No-4, Ps- Garahiya OP Dist- East Champaran 3.

Raju Sahni son of Late Duli Sahni Village- Loharganwa W.No-4, PsGarahiya OP Dist- East Champaran 4.

Runi Devi @ Runi Kumari wife of Raju Sahni Village- Loharganwa W.No4, Ps- Garahiya OP Dist- East Champaran 5.

Vijay Sahni @ Vijay Sahani son of Punit Sahni Village- Loharganwa W.No4, Ps- Garahiya OP Dist- East Champaran 6.

Mahendra Sahni son of Amir Sahni Village- Loharganwa W.No-4, PsGarahiya OP Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Usha Kumari, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Madhuban (Garahiya O.P.) P.S. Case No. 160 of 2024, G.R. No. 2007 of 2024 registered under Sections 341, 323, 354B, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, these petitioners abused and assaulted informant by means of legs and slaps, due to which

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62977 of 2024(2) dt.21-09-2024 2/2 she sustained injury. It is further alleged that the accused persons also tried to outrage the modesty of informant.

4. Having considered the nature of accusation, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioners is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) utkarsh/- U T