Pintu Sahani @ Pinto Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52234 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2025 Thana- SACHIVALAYA District- Patna ====================================================== Pintu Sahani @ Pinto Sahni Son of Gorakh Sahaney @ Gorakh Sahani Resident of H No. 44 Chhatauni tola, Ghusukpur PS -Chhatauni District -Sheohar P/A- Mohalla Naukathiya, Lalita bhawan, Circular road, PsSachivalaya Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashutosh Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable in connection with Sachivalaya P.S. Case No.60 of 2025 under Sections 126(2), 329(4), 115(2), 109, 351(2) and 351(3) of the BNS, 2023 pending before the court of A.C.J.M.-II, Patna.

3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against the petitioner against whom there is allegation of assault to the younger son of the informant due to which injury has been caused.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52234 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/2 that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that petitioner and informant are relative and due to land dispute, the occurrence took place. He further submits that only with a view to harass the petitioner, the present case has been lodged.

5. Learned Counsel also submits that antecedent of the petitioner is clean.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner to assault the son of the informant.

7. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, therefore the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

8. However, trial court is directed to consider the regular bail application of the petitioner, if he surrenders within 6 weeks from today and prays for regular bail, then trial court shall pass order without being prejudice of the present order preferably on the same day.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T