← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12739/2023dismissed

Nitu Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-15Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12739 of 2023 ====================================================== Nitu Sharma Wife of Dilip Sharma @ Mallu Sharma, Resident of VillageBardaha, Anchal- Bagaha-1, P.S.- Bagaha- 1, District- West Champaran (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director Social Welfare, Patna.

3.

The Deputy Director, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 4.

The District Magistrate- West Champaran, Betiah. 5.

The District Programme Officer, West Champaran, Betiah. 6.

The Child Development Programme Officer, Bagaha-1, West Champaran. 7.

The Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Singari - Pipariya, Bagaha- 1, West Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Suresh Prasad Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S.K. Mandal (Sc3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 15-01-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1(I) For that a nature of certiorari to setting a side order dated 26.6.2023 passed by Learned Court of District Magistrate, West Champaran connection with R.M. Bettiah in 37/15-16 whose by where under the Learned Court has mentioned that no any provision to review it an order.

(II) For that this writ application is being filed for direction to the respondent

Patna High Court CWJC No.12739 of 2023(2) dt.15-01-2024 2/2 concern to select the petitioner on the post of Sevika in Anganwari Centre of - 50 on the ground that the petitioner is illegible candidate and selected through Aam Sabha held in Gram panchayat - Raj Singhari -Pipariya Anchal, Bagaha -1, District-West Champaran."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a civil suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U