Patna High CourtMJC/3892/2014disposed

Ram Briksh Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-29The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3892 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15946 of 2012 ====================================================== Ram Briksh Singh, Son of Late Dhaneshwar Singh Resident of Village Bastibigha, P.S. Nardiganj, District-Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Mr. R.K.Mahajan The principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. (Now Education Department ) Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. Mr. Ram Bujhawan Choudhary, The District Secondary Education, H.R.D (Now Education Department) New Secretariat, Patna.

4. Mr. Medo Lal Das, The Regional Deputy Director, Magadh Division, Gaya

5. Md. S.A.Hussain. The District Education Officer, Nawada.

6. Mr. Amarjeet Singh. The Secretary , Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

7. Md. Rashid Tanveer. The District Accounts Officer, Nawada. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Md. Harun Quareshi, A.C. to S.C. 01 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 29-11-2017 Keeping in view the averments made in paragraph 11 of the show-cause filed by the respondents on 01.09.2017 and the documents annexed thereto, now with regard to the issue in question wherein the only direction by the Writ Court was to consider the representation and take a decision, no further indulgence is required to be made in these contempt proceedings. In case the petitioner has any grievance still subsisting with regard to the issue in question, the petitioner may challenge the same afresh in accordance with law. In this

Patna High Court MJC No.3892 of 2014(5) dt.29-11-2017 2/2 contempt application as the innocuous direction to consider the representation has already been complied with, this Court does not see any reason to proceed any further.

The application is, accordingly, disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) P.K.P.