Ravindra Yadav @ Ravi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64434 of 2018 (2) dt.26-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.64434 of 2018 ======================================================

1. RAVINDRA YADAV @ RAVI, Son of Late Bhuneshwar Yadav, Resident of Aasma, P.S.- Pakribarawa, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Prasad, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-10-2018 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Beur P.S. Case No. 158 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 364(A), 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping the father of informant and demanding ransom for that. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the statement of father of the informant was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and the statement clearly falsifies the prosecution story. Further petitioner has been in judicial custody since 02.06.2018 and other similarly circumstances co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.09.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 57132 of 2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64434 of 2018 (2) dt.26-10-2018 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thusand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM -VIII, Patna, in connection with Beur P.S. Case No. 158 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T