Tarannum Shiri And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1936 of 2012 ======================================================

1. Tarannum Shiri, D/O Md. Jamaluddin are resident of Village-Urain, P.S.-Kajra, District-Lakhisarai.

2. Shaista Anjum, D/O Syed Shahabuddin, resident of Village-Dilawarpur, P.S.-Kotwali Munger, District-Munger.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar.

3. Secretary, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar.

4. Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar.

5. District Magistrate, Lakhisarai.

6. District Programme Officer, Lakhisarai.

7. Block Development Officer, Surajgraha, District-Lakhisarai.

8. Block Education Extension Officer, Surajgarha, District-Lakhisarai.

9. Member, District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Lakhisarai.

10. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Urain, P.S. Kajra, District-Lakhisarai.

11. Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Urain, District-Lakhisarai.

12. Radha Devi, Wife of Kulendra Manjhi Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Urain, P.S. Kajra, District-Lakhisarai.

13. Raghudev Yadav, Panchayat Secretary, Son of not known to the Petitioner Gram Panchayat Raj, Urain, P.S.-Surajgarha, DistrictLakhisarai.

14. Sindhu Kumari, D/O Sanjeev Kumar, resident of Village Gobasa, P.S. Sheikhpura, District-Patna.

15. Prem Kumar, S/O Birendra Singh, resident of Village-Pawai, P.S. Surajgarha, District-Lakhisarai.

16. Renu Kumari, D/O Arun Kumar Das, resident of Village-Madhopur (Krishnapuri Colony), Post-Basudeopur, P.S. Town, District-Munger. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Pawan Kr. Mishra Gp22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-08-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ application with a liberty to prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority, challenging the order

Patna High Court CWJC No.1936 of 2012 (9) dt.23-08-2017 2/2 dated 04.05.2011 contained in Memo No. 155 dated 04.05.2011, passed in Appeal Nos. 119/10-11, 120/10-11, 91/10-11 and 87/1011 by the Member, District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Lakhisarai.

Permission is accorded.

The petitioners shall file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority within a period of thirty days from the date of the order, which shall be disposed of in accordance with law within the statutory period.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ application stands disposed of.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U