Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54227/2023allowed

Pintu Sao v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-05Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54227 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2022 Thana- BUNIYAD GANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Pintu Sao S/O Rampravesh Saw @ Ram Pravesh Sao R/O Village/MohallaSondhi, Ps. Buniyadganj, Dist. Gaya (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kaushlendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 05-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of killing the daughter of the informant due to nonfulfillment of further dowry demand.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. He submitted that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased. There is no any prior complaint regarding assaulting, harassment and torturing to the deceased against the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54227 of 2023(4) dt.05-12-2023 2/2 and others. There is no consistent evidence and no eye-witness of the alleged occurrence. On the basis of suspicion, the petitioner has been implicated in the present case. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 08.08.2022.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned in connection with Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 180 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T