← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40030/2016rejected

Vishal Kumar Paswan @ Vishal Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2016-09-21Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40030 of 2016 (2) dt.21-09-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40030 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -334 Year- 2015 Thana -HAJIPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Vishal Kumar Paswan @ Vishal Paswan Son of Bhushan Kumar Paswan Resident of village - Subhash Chowk, P.S. Hajipur Town, District Vaishali .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chaubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 21-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 20.04.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 6661 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 01.08.2015, he has not been put on test identification parade, recovered amount has also not been put on test identification parade and without any recovery and cogent material the petitioner is suffering in custody, in another case the petitioner has been allowed bail to which the learned APP opposes by pointing out the alleged recovery of notes having seal and further the petitioner has got criminal antecedent. In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40030 of 2016 (2) dt.21-09-2016 petitioner, again his prayer for bail stands rejected. However, let the trial be expedited and concluded as early as possible, preferably within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which the petitioner, if at no fault, may renew his prayer for bail before the court below itself.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T