Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64072/2018bail granted

Binod Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-11-02Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64072 of 2018 (2) dt.02-11-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.64072 of 2018 ====================================================== Binod Kumar Singh S/o Subhash Chandra Singh, Resident of VillageBahuara, Police Station-Chauri, District-Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 320/2018, registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant alleged that petitioner and other co-accused looted the articles kept in his Godown on the point of knife. It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no recovery from his possession. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is in custody since 25.07.2018.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64072 of 2018 (2) dt.02-11-2018 amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate II, Danapur in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 320/2018, subject to the conditions:

(1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T