Md Mustaq Alam v. State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18522 of 2021 ====================================================== Md Mustaq Alam S/o - Md. Anul Haque, resident of Village and Post - Khaje Chand Chapara, P.S.- Goraul, Begham Patti Vaishali, Dist.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, ICDS, Patna.

4.

District Magistrate, Dist.- Vaishali.

5.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Dist.- Vaishali. 6.

The Child Development Project Officer, Block - Chehara Kala, Dist.- Vaishali.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijay Shankar Choubey, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prasant Pratap ( Gp2 ) Mr. Asit Kumar Jha, AC to GP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 13-03-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1(i). For the issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions in the nature of writ of Certiorari for setting aside the letter dated 27.7.2021 containing memo no 1028 issued by the District Programme officer, Vaishali whereby and whereunder the D.P.O Vaishali has asked show cause through show cause notice to the petitioner regarding his academic certificate. (ii). For issuance of Writ of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent authorities to

Patna High Court CWJC No.18522 of 2021(2) dt.13-03-2024 2/2 not disturb the selection of the petitioner who has been selected and appointed on the post of Block Coordinator after completion of the due process under law.

(iii). For issuance of Writ of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent authorities to make payment of the petitioner which is dues since his joining i.e from. November 2020."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction. Liberty, so sought, is granted. 3.

The writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U