Tarkeshwar Sah v. North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17329 of 2014 ===========================================================
1. Tarkeshwar Sah S/o Late Jamindar Sah Resident of Village Dumri Rasulpur, P.O. Dumri Balua, P.S. Doriganj, District Saran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. through its Managing Director.
2. Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Circle, Chapra.
3. Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Chapra West.
4. Sri Alok Kumar, Junior Engineer, Electric Supply Subdivision, Chapra West Rural.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : none For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-09-2018 None appears on behalf of the petitioner despite call being repeated after interval.
2. On the earlier occasion on 18.09.2018, as well the petitioner was not represented. This Court is not inclined to adjourn the matter for longer.
3. Present writ petition has been filed for a direction to respondent to move the 11000 volt overhead electric line from the roof of residential house of the petitioner which has forcibly been got stretched by the respondent no. 4 endangering the life and property of the petitioner and his family members.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent invites reference to para-4 of the counter affidavit to oppose the writ petition. It has been stated that as a matter of fact, the petitioner had himself constructed temporary garaz on the road after stretching of electric wire by the department and hence, it is incorrect to say that the respondents had stretched 11 KV wire over the roof of the house of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.17329 of 2014 dt.19-09-2018 2/2 petitioner.
5. Having regard to the specific averments of the respondents as aforesaid which has not been denied as no rejoinder to the counter affidavit has been filed, the writ petition is devoid of merit
6. The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed. (Vikash Jain, J) sushma/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date