Bhashkar Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.63897 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -154 Year- 2018 Thana -RIGA District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Bhashkar Kumar, S/o Baidhnath Rai, Resident of Village- Kharsan, P.S.- Riaga, District- Sitamarhi.

2. Pintu Kumar, S/o Sevak Rai, Resident of Village- Kharsan, P.S.- Riaga (Riga), District- Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahmad Ali, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The Petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Riaga (Riga) P.S. Case No. 154 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 385, 387, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioners as per F.I.R. is that the petitioners along with others are of demand of ransom from the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case and there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. It is also submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they are in custody since 13.08.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63897 of 2018 (2) dt.25-10-2018 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate- II, Sitamarhi in connection with Riaga ( Riga) P.S.Case No. 154 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

iii) It is made clear that if petitioners found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T