Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64451/2018bail granted

Ranjeet Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-26Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64451 of 2018 (2) dt.26-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.64451 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Ranjeet Ram, S/o Brahamdev Ram, Resident of Village- Piparia, P.S.- Turkauliya, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjana Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S. Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-10-2018 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 554 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 18 litres of country made liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and seizure list does not show recovery from the possession of the petitioner. Further, he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 25.08.2018.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64451 of 2018 (2) dt.26-10-2018 circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise, Motihari, in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 554 of 2018, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T