Shahid @ Md. Shahid @ Sahid v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.63245 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2018 Thana- DAGARUA District- Purnia ====================================================== SHAHID @ MD. SHAHID @ SAHID S/o Late Hamid @ Bikoo, resident of Village- Makaili, P.S. Dagarwa, District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pramod Kumar Mallick For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Narendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Dagarwa P.S. Case No. 86 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Section 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against petitioner is of being involved in killing the daughter of the informant with other co-accused. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is friend of husband of deceased and he is villager. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 08.06.2018.
Learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63245 of 2018(2) dt.26-10-2018 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M. Purnea, in connection with Dagarwa P.S. Case No. 86 of 2018 subject to the condition that:-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every dated fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case diary, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T