← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52410/2025bail granted

Ram Bhajan Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-11Mr. Justice Khatim Reza4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52410 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-188 Year-2024 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ram Bhajan Mukhiya, Son of Bauwelal Mukhiya, Resident of Village - Aukaunaha, P.S.- Dewdha, District - Madhubani, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vikas Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 188 of 2024 dated 16.10.2024 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 25(1-B)a/26/35 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on the alleged date of occurrence, police received information about assembly of 6-7 miscreants in some orchard. A raid was conducted and four persons including the petitioner were apprehended while two co-accused persons managed to escape. From the possession of petitioner, a Pulsar NS400Z motorcycle without registration number having Chasis No.

2/4 MD2C49MX2RCF15216 and Engine No. JLXCRF53142 and a Redmi Mobile phone were recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was arrested at the spot. Only one motorcycle and one mobile phone were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Nothing incriminating articles have been recovered form the possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that four persons were apprehended at the spot, out of which three persons namely, Sonu Mandal, Nand Lal Yadav and Santosh Kumar have been granted bail by different co-ordinate Benches of this Court vide order dated 25.03.2025 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous Nos. 15207 of 2025, order dated 16.04.2025 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 18227 of 2025 and order dated 05.05.2025 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.

26818 of 2025 respectively. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 17.10.2024 having one criminal case against him. It is further submitted that in the impugned order, it has been wrongly mentioned two criminal antecedents. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for

3/4 bail of the petitioner.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Madhubani in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 188 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:-

1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

2. One of the bailors will be his own blood relation, preferably father, mother, brother, sister and or his wife.

3. The bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is made accused in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of

4/4 misuse.

4. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

5. The petitioner within two weeks of his release from custody shall appear before the S.H.O. of his local area alongwith a copy of this order and shall appear every fortnightly to mark his attendance till the framing of charge in this case.

(Khatim Reza, J) premchand/- U T