Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64934/2018bail granted

Varun Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

2018-11-02Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.64934 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -298 Year- 2018 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictGAYA ====================================================== Varun Pandit S/o Suresh Pandit @ Om Prakash Pandit Resident of Bokaro Sector 9 P.S. Harla Distt.-Bokaro .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Veena Rani Prasadd. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Excise Case No. 298/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(A) and 56 (D) of the Bihar Excise Act.

Allegation is recovery of 570 litres of Masaledar wine from the vehicle of the petitioner.

It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from his possession and has no concern with the seized liquour. Petitioner has clean antecedent. He is in custody since 19.08.2018.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner above-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64934 of 2018 (2) dt.02-11-2018 2/2 named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Excise Case No. 298/2018, subject to the conditions:

(1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T