Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55509/2016bail granted

Mukesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-01-11Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55509 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -264 Year- 2016 Thana -ARA NAWADA District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar Singh S/O Late Akhilesh Singh Resident of Village- Ram Nagar Kunjan Tola, P.S.- Chandi. District- Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiv Prasad Gupta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chaubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 264 of 2016 registered for offences under sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner had earlier moved before this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 17287 of 2016 and this Court vide order dated 28.4.2016 had rejected the prayer for bail with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after nine months' of judicial custody. The petitioner is in custody since 9.3.2016.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody, let the petitioner, namely, Mukesh Kumar Singh, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55509 of 2016 (2) dt.11-01-2017 of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ara, Bhojpur in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 264 of 2016, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would cooperate the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U T