Nageshwar Dubey And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14716 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Nageshwar Dubey Son of Late Deep Raj Dubey resident of Belisarai, P.S. - Motihari, District - Motihari, retired as lecturer in subject of Physics from M.S. College, Motihari.

2. Arshul Majeed S/o Late Shekh Md. Gani resident of Chikpatti, P.S. - Motihari, P.S. - Motihari, District - Motihari, retired as lecturer in subject of Physics from M.S. College, Motihari.

3. Md. Ghulam Ghaus S/o Late Md. Hadees resident of Bhawanipur Zirat, P.S. - Chhatauni, District - Motihari, retired as lecturer in subject of Chemistry from M.S. College, Motihari.

4. Yogendra Prasad Sah S/o Late Jagi Sah resident of Belisarai, P.S. - Motihari, District - Motihari, retired as lecturer in subject of Physics from M.S. College, Motihari.

5. Kameshwar Prasad Singh S/o Late Jai Nath Singh resident of village - New Chandmari Motihari, P.S. - Motihari, District - Motihari, retired as lecturer in subject of Chemistry from M.S. College, Motihari.

6. Uday Narain Singh S/o Late Baldeo Singh resident of Sri Krishna Nagar, Motihari, P.S. - Motihari, District - Motihari, retired as lecturer in subject of Botany from L.N.D. College, Motihari.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Vice-Chancellor, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

4. The Registrar, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

5. The Finance Officer, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Arbind Nath Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 03-10-2018 In view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Dr. Sunil Kumar Yadav vs. State of Bihar [2018(3) PLJR 354], the issue raised in the present writ application does not merit any consideration as the Court has already held out that the scheme of time bound promotion has ceased to exist after

Patna High Court CWJC No.14716 of 2014(4) dt.03-10-2018 2/2 23.09.1995.

In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed being devoid of merit.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) mrl./- U