Ravi Kumar Sahni @ Ravi Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54938 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2016 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ravi Kumar Sahni @ Ravi Sahni Son Of Bilat Sahni @ Bilat Sahani VillageGazipur, P.S.- Desri, District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 09-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bhagwanpur Police Station Case No. 129 of 2016 registered for the offence under Section 379 of IPC.

3. As per the prosecution case, on 05.08.2016 at around 01.30 PM the informant parked his bike in front of the State Bank of India and went to the bank to deposit money. When he came to his bike after depositing the money, his bike was not there. Even after extensive searching, his bike was not found. There was a cheque book of Canara Bank kept in the dicky of the said vehicle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. He next submits that the petitioner is not named in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54938 of 2024(2) dt.09-08-2024 2/2 the FIR and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the petitioner was in custody in another case and police remanded him in the present case on 30.01.2024. He next submits that name of the petitioner surfaced on the basis of confessional statement of two other co-accused, namely, Sandeep Kumar and Ratnesh Kumar. Investigation is already concluded and charge sheet has already been submitted in this case against the petitioner. He next submits that no T.I.P. has been conducted till date.

5. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for regular bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 129 of 2016.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) saurabhkr/- U T