Dhirendra Kumar @ Dhiru @ Dhiraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59944 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2020 Thana- MUSRIGHRARI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Dhirendra Kumar @ Dhiru @ Dhiraj Kumar Son Of Hit Lal Singh Resident Of Village- Baghi Ekdara, Ps- Muffasil, Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Narain Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Mushrigharari P.S. Case No. 129 of 2020 registered under sections 302 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. According to prosecution case, the informant along with her son went to see their agricultural field. She further stated that after her son went to the shop of barber, in the meantime, co-accused persons along with this petitioner came on two motorcycles and made indiscriminate firing on her son, after that he was taken to hospital but he died. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59944 of 2023(2) dt.08-09-2023 2/2 falsely been implicated in this case due to village politics. It is further submitted that there is no specific allegation has been levelled against the petitioner. He has no concern with the alleged offence. Similarly situated other co-accused person namely, Vinod Kumar Singh @ Bindi Singh has already been granted bail by this Bench vide order dated 15.03.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 55544 of 2022. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 21.06.2023.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Mushrigharari P.S. Case No. 129 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate- 1st Class, Samastipur. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) lata/- U T