Guddu Quraishi v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.66485 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-651 Year-2015 Thana- JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Guddu Quraishi, Son of Late Saheb Quraishi @ Sahab Quraishi, Resident of Mohalla- Zafarganj Jehanabad, Police Station & District- Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Gulpasa Parween, Wife of Guddu Quraishi, Resident of Mohalla- Zafarganj, Jehanabad, Police Station & Dist- Jehanabad, at present resident in MohallaSekhalamchak, Jehanabad, Police Station & Dist- Jehanabad. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukul Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Informant. Petitioner seeks bail in Complaint Case No. 651 of 2015 vide Trial No. 1978 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of torturing the complainant for non fulfillment of demand of dowry along with FIR named accused.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It has been further submitted that petitioner never demanded dowry or

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66485 of 2018(2) dt.05-11-2018 2/2 subjected her to cruelty. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 10.08.2017. Learned counsel for the Informant vehemently opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate-Jehanabad, in connection with Complaint Case No. 651 of 2015 vide Trial No. 1978 of 2015, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U