Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41539/2016bail granted

Anjay Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-03Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41539 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -46 Year- 2016 Thana -SARE District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Anjay Paswan son of Janardhan Paswan resident of Village- Hargawan, P.S.- Sare, District- Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rabindra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 03-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 19.06.2016 in connection with Sare P.S. Case No. 46 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and there is case and counter case between the parties. The accusations are general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner being the informant of Sare P.S. Case No. 47 of 2016 has himself sustained head injury. Other co-accused persons namely, Shivalak Paswan@ Shivbalak Paswan and Radha Devi have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 31664 of 2016 and Cr. Misc. No. 34424 of 2016, respectively.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41539 of 2016 (2) dt.03-10-2016 2/2 Biharsharif in connection with Sare P.S. Case No. 46 of 2016 on the (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T