← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52863/2022bail granted

Md. Ali Akbar @ Alee Akbar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-08Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52863 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2022 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Md. Ali Akbar @ Alee Akbar Son Of Ali Akbar @ Sadik Ali R/O VillageNarsara, P.S.- Bishanpur, Dist.- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Mohan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-12-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323,504,506 and 34 of IPC and 3/4 of D.P.Act. The prosecution case, in short, is that the allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent. He has falsely been implicated

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52863 of 2022(2) dt.08-12-2022 2/3 in the present case. Further submits that the allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated. Further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including the petitioner and in fact the petitioner is father-in-law of the informant.

Learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Darbhanga Mahila P.S. Case No. 32 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with other following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52863 of 2022(2) dt.08-12-2022 3/3 reason, his bail bonds shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T