Praveen Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15169 of 2019 ====================================================== Praveen Singh, Son of Subhash Prasad Singh, Resident of Village-Malaypur, P.O.-P.S.-Malaypur, District-Jamui, PIN Code-811313 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Primary Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Primary Education Department, Government of BIhar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Primary Education, Government of BIhar, Patna. 4.

The District Matgistrate, Jamui.

5.

The District Programme Officer Establishment), Education Department, Jamui.

6.

The Block Development Oficer Chakai, District-Jamui. 7.

The Block Education Officer, Chakai District-Jamui 8.

The Panchayat Sachive Panchayat Niyojan Gram Panchayat Raj Dulampur, Chakai, District-Jamui.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Madhaw Pd. Yadaw (GP-23) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 29-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is aggrieved by non-payment of salary. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been legally and validly appointed and he has been regularly working but till date he has not been paid salary. The issue of payment of salary requires factual enquiry as to validity of appointment and actual working for

Patna High Court CWJC No.15169 of 2019(2) dt.29-07-2019 2/2 which the District Programme Officer (Establishment) , Jamui is the competent authority.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Jamui to enquiry into the matter and if it is found that appointment of the petitioner is legal and valid and he has actually worked, ensure payment of salary and all consequential benefits to him. Necessary decision in this regard must be taken by the respondents within a maximum period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U