← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18572/2021disposed

Nusrat Hashmi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-10Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18572 of 2021 ====================================================== Nusrat Hashmi Wife of Sohail Hashmi, Resident of Mohalla - Belisarai, Ward No. 29, Behind Sadar Hospital, P.S. - Nagar, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Deputy Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari. 4.

The District Education Officer, East Champaran, Motihari. 5.

The District Programme Officer, (Establishment), East Champaran, Motihari.

6.

Block Education Officer, Sadar, Motihari.

7.

Nuzhat Hashmi, Wife of Kadir Ahmad, Resident of Mohalla - Khudanagar, Near Urdu Primary School, Post - Motihari, P.S. - Chhatauni, District - East Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Krishna Kant Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr Sunil Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the State :

Mrs. Binita Singh, SC-28 Mr. Nishant Kumar Jha, AC to SC-28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-02-2026 Heard Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the Respondents-State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, by referring to the statements made in paragraphs-6 and 7 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of Respondent No.7, Nuzhat Hashmi, submits that the issues between them have been settled vide Annexure- 'A' which is appended with the counter affidavit and, as such, the authorities may be directed to take final decision

Patna High Court CWJC No.18572 of 2021(5) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 with regard to family pension in respect of the petitioner and as also Respondent No.7.

3. Learned counsel representing the State submits that they (petitioner & Respondent No.7) may be directed to file an appropriate representation and if the entitlements of these persons are found to fall within the parameters as stipulated in the Government instruction issued in reference to the Bihar Pension Rules, 1950, then appropriate decisions may be directed to be taken in accordance with law.

4. Be that as it may, the parties are directed to approach the authorities, who are competent in law, for getting their issues addressed, and on filing of such representation within a period of four weeks, it is expected that necessary orders shall be passed.

5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.

(Ajit Kumar, J) perwez U