Dharmendra Yadav @ Dhamerd Yadav @ Dharmete Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53447 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2023 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Dharmendra Yadav @ Dhamerd Yadav @ Dharmete Yadav Son Of Laxman Yadav Resident Of Village- Arraha, Ps- Jaynagar, Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 93 of 2023 dated 05.03.2023 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 341, 323, 353, 379, 307, 120B read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, on secret information, some liquor smugglers are about to go on motorcycles loaded with liquor towards Belhi. When the informant reached at the bridge of Belhi then 10-15 motorcycles loaded with liquor were seen coming. Thereafter, the accused persons surrounded and assaulted the informant. They were armed with pistol and knife and tried to kill the informant. It is further alleged that the accused persons looted the motorcycle, mobile, ATM card, Aadhar card, purse,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53447 of 2023(4) dt.10-11-2023 2/2 golden chain and Rs. 2000/- in cash form the informant. They also assaulted the informant on his chest, head and stomach.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Madhubani in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 93 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T