Shankar Mandwa @ Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.64433 of 2018 ====================================================== Shankar Mandwa @ Rahul Kumar, Son of Sadhu Prasad @ Anuj Prasad, Resident of - R. Block, Road No. 1, Jhoppadpati in front of Quarter No. C/17, Police Station - Sachivalaya, District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satrudhan Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anish Chandra, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-10-2018 The petitioner is in custody since 18.08.2018 in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 536 of 2018 arising out of G.R. No. 5378 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26/35 of the Arms Act.
Allegation is of recovery of two cartridges from the possession of the petitioner and further it appears that he is also accused in two other cases.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has already spent two months in custody and undertakes to abide by any condition imposed upon him.
Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Having heard both sides and considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64433 of 2018 (2) dt.29-10-2018 2/2 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 536 of 2018 arising out of G.R. No. 5378 of 2018, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T