Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1630 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4071 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Sunil Kumar Son of Shri Prabhunath Rai, R/o Village - Chainpur, P.S. - Hathua, District - Gopalganj.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Education Officer, Gopalganj.

4. The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Gopalganj.

5. The Block Education Officer, Hathua, District - Gopalganj.

6. The Headmaster, Government Middle School Chainpur, Block - Hathua, District - Gopalganj.

7. The Headmaster, Government Primary School Chainpur, (South), Block - Hathua, District - Gopalganj.

8. The Union of India, Through the Joint Secretary Ministry of Human Resources Department (Department of Education), Government of India.

9. The Principal, Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Balesra, Via - Mirganj, District - Gopalganj.

10. The Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gp27- Purnendu Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 18-02-2016 We have heard Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, learned Counsel for the appellant, and Mr. Purnendu Singh, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the State respondents. We have also heard Ms. Punam Kumari Singh, Central Government Counsel, for Union of India, and Mr. J. P. Karn,

Patna High Court LPA No.1630 of 2015 (3) dt.18-02-2016 2/2 learned Senior Advocate, appearing on behalf of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya.

Learned Counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application in future. No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the appellant.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the appeal is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ.) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U