Md. Tanweer v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49454 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2018 Thana- PRANPUR District- Katihar ====================================================== MD. TANWEER Son of Gyasuddin Resident of Purana Baida, P.S.-Amdabad, District-Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashraf Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Pranpur P.S. Case No. 101 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner had earlier moved this Court for regular bail vide Criminal Miscellaneous No. 60783 of 2018 which was rejected on 28.11.2018 with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completing one year in custody.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49454 of 2019(2) dt.07-08-2019 2/2 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is in custody since 14.07.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Katihar, in connection with Pranpur P.S. Case No. 101 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T