Patna High CourtCR. MISC./65016/2018bail granted

Tarkeshwar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-11-05Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.65016 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2018 Thana- AANDAR District- Siwan ====================================================== Tarkeshwar Yadav Son of late Devki Yadav Resident of Village-Faridpur Mathiya, P.S. Hussainganj,Distt.-Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Andar P.S. Case No. 155 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272, 273 and 308 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 32.220 Litre of illicit liquor from motorcycle.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 11.08.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65016 of 2018(2) dt.05-11-2018 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-Iind, Siwan, in connection with Andar P.S. Case No. 155 of 2018, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U