← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55552/2024bail granted

Dhan Raj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-28Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55552 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2024 Thana- ARA MUFFSIL District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Dhan Raj Yadav Son Of Lalpati Yadav Village- Tenua, Ps- Ara Muffasil, DistBhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-08-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State, Shri Chandra Bhushan Prasad. 2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that he along with Jaylal Kumar were going to Ara when they were intercepted by the accused persons including the petitioner; and petitioner assaulted him by an iron rod causing injury on head, while Prince assaulted Jaylal by an iron rod causing fracture of hand.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the date of occurrence is 17-5-2024 and the FIR came to be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55552 of 2024(2) dt.28-08-2024 2/2 instituted on 19-5-2024. It is also submitted that the injury suffered by the informant is simple in nature which amply demonstrates that petitioner never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence nor the blow was repeated. It is fairly submitted that opinion with regard to injury of Jaylal has been reserved but then he is alleged to have been assaulted by Prince.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Ara Mufassil P.S. Case No. 148 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T