Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64423/2018bail granted

Deepak Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-26Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.64423 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Deepak Mishra, Son of Dilip Mishra, Resident of Village- Khaira, P.S.- Khaira, District- Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Case No. 281 (C 2)/2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30 (A) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Allegation against the petitioner as per F.I.R. is of recovery of 40 liters of mahua wine from the bush, near the house of the petitioner and accordingly, seizure list has been prepared. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 14.09.2018 Heard learned A.P.P also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64423 of 2018 (2) dt.26-10-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District Judge- II, Jamui in connection with Case No. 281 (C2)/ 2018, subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

iii) It is made clear that if petitioner found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T