← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62694/2021bail granted

Amit Kumar @ Amarji v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-13Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62694 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2021 Thana- BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== AMIT KUMAR @ AMARJI Son of Suresh Mandal Resident of Kishan Nagar, Phulkia, P.S. - Kahalgaon, District - Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Nisha Kumari Daughter of Sudhir Mandal Resident of Village Madhuban Tintanga, P.S. - Bihariganj, District - Madhepura, At present D/o- Sudhir Mandal Resident of - Lodipur, P.O. - Khairpur, Ward No. -10, P.S. - Kharik, Dist. - Bhagalpur.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashutosh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pronoti Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-07-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498A and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegedly, complainant was physically and mentally tortured by the petitioner and his family members for demand of motorcycle.

The main submissions advanced by the learned counsel

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62694 of 2021(4) dt.13-07-2022 2/3 for the petitioner are that on last date at the request of the petitioner, notices were sent to petitioner's wife (opposite party no.2) for conciliation. Thereafter conciliation process started in between petitioner and his wife at their own level and now dispute in between them has been sorted out and presently they have started living together and they are peacefully leading conjugal life since 21.6.2022 and in this regard petitioner has filed supplementary affidavit. Further submission is that present case is based on the complaint and other co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by the court below.

Learned APP appearing for the State submits that development having taken place between the petitioner and his wife, conduct of the petitioner should be under watch for sometime, if he is considered for the relief of anticipatory bail. Having considered, new development in between the petitioner and his wife as appears from the supplementary affidavit which shows conjugal relationship having restored in between them, in my view, a lenient approach may be taken in respect of the petitioner. In the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, the petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Naugahciya, Bhagalpur in Complaint Case No. 17 of 2021 subject to condition under section 438(2) Cr. P.C and further on this condition

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62694 of 2021(4) dt.13-07-2022 3/3 that in the next six months if any complaint with regard to behaviour of the petitioner is raised by his wife before the court below then after proper inquiry into such matter, learned court below will have a liberty to take necessary steps against the petitioner for cancellation of his bail granted to the petitioner, if substance is found in such complaint.

(Shailendra Singh, J) s.hassan/- U T