Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64969/2018bail granted

Chanesh Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2018-11-05Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.64969 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -303 Year- 2018 Thana -ATRI District- GAYA ====================================================== Chanesh Devi Wife of Late Nawal Manjhi Resident of Village-Tetua Tola, Kharauna,P.S. Atri, Distt.-Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Saxena, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Atri P.S. Case No. 303/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 30(a)(d) of Bihar Excise Act.

Allegation against petitioner is that 05 liters of Mahua wine has been recovered from her house.

It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. She has no concern with the seized wine. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. She is in custody since 04.09.2018.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner above-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64969 of 2018 (2) dt.05-11-2018 2/2 named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 303/2018, subject to the conditions:

(1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T