Gulshan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53098 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2023 Thana- MATIHANI District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

GULSHAN KUMAR SON OF SHIVJI RAM @ SHIVKUMAR RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KHARIDI, PS- MATIHANI, DISTBEGUSARAI 2.

BRAJESH RAM @ BRAJESH KUMAR SON OF SHIVJI RAM @ SHIVKUMAR RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KHARIDI, PSMATIHANI, DIST- BEGUSARAI 3.

RANI DEVI WIFE OF SHIVJI RAM @ SHIVKUMAR RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KHARIDI, PS- MATIHANI, DIST- BEGUSARAI 4.

SHIVJI RAM @ SHIVKUMAR RAM @ SHIVJI RAMA SON OF LATE UCHIT RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KHARIDI, PS- MATIHANI, DIST- BEGUSARAI 5.

KANCHAN KUMARI @ KANCHAN DEVI WIFE OF LATE LAL BABU RAM @ LAL BABU KUMAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGEBAGRAHADIH, PS- BARAUNI, DIST- BEGUSARAI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nilendu Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-08-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498(A), 379, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and have been falsely implicated by the informant being brother-in-laws,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53098 of 2023(2) dt.23-08-2023 2/2 mother-in-law, father-in-law and married sister-in-law of his daughter. Learned counsel next submits that from bare perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the allegation of demand, torture and assault is general and omnibus in nature, it is further submitted that husband of the informant is in custody.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 59 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T