Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55315/2025dismissed

Mishrilal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-12Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55315 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2023 Thana- PARSAUNI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Mishrilal Kumar son of Late Bhikhari Sah Resident of Village- Dhurwar, P.S.- Parsauni, Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Pushpa Sinha.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Parsauni P.S. Case No. 106 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 365, 506/34, 364, 302, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 05.10.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 65569 of 2024, which reads as follows:

"Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Parsauni P.S. Case No. 106 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 363, 365, 506/34, 364, 302, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55315 of 2025(2) dt.12-09-2025 2/2

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner after conspiring with one Pinku Upadhyay has killed the five-year-old boy. Petitioner is in custody since 17.08.2023.

4. During investigation sufficient material have come to connect the petitioner with the crime.

5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as the materials available on record, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this application for regular bail is dismissed. The court below is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner."

4. Learned counsel for the informant submits that out of 10 witnesses, eight witnesses have already been examined.

5. Considering the serious allegation against the petitioner and also the fact that the trial is on the verge of conclusionl, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T